Houdini Podcasts

Tuesday, October 27, 2026

The Other Houdini, Tony Curtis: Podcast Transcript


This is the transcript of episode 92 of the Magic Detective Podcast, The Other Houdini - Tony Curtis. Listen to the full episode here. The transcript was generated automatically, so expect a few spelling slips.

This is Episode 92 of The Magic Detective Podcast. On this episode you'll hear about the magical life of the other Houdini, Tony Curtis. That and more on this episode of The Magic Detective Podcast. Hello and welcome to The Magic Detective Podcast, your podcast home for magic history. I'm your host, Dean Carnegie. I am The Magic Detective. And this is Episode number 92. I can't believe it's July already. I have been swamped with shows and preparations for a tour, which I am currently on. I had been working on a previous podcast episode, but it was coming along rather slowly.

So that one, which was on John Booth, is going to be bumped for the time being. But I've got a new one all ready to go. And I think you're really going to enjoy that episode. But before I get to that, let me mention the last episode, which was on Tommy Wonder and the accompanying blog article. It was a big hit, really was. The blog article was a transcript of the podcast, but with all kinds of links to the various tricks that I spoke of. And I kind of wish I had added more, as I did leave out some of Tommy's material.

Maybe my favorite routine is one that I left out, which was his version of the bandit trick, or I think he called it Ring Watch Wallet. His method is a real fooler. The trick was invented by Oswald Williams. And by the way, who is Oswald Williams? I've heard this name before, but I don't really know much about him. He is definitely going to be the subject of a future podcast. The original trick, I think, was called Hold Up, as in being held up by a robber, a criminal, a thief, etc.

And as the performer explains what happened, he or she was held up. He or she removes their ring, their watch, and their money in the course of telling this story. And then those objects disappear, and mysteriously, at the end of the story, reappear back on their finger, the watch back on their wrist, and the money back in the wallet. And it's a great routine. And I know that Alan Shaxson of England made a big hit with this in his show, and also Marvin Roy, aka Mr. Electric, did a version of the trick. And that's actually where I saw it the first time, was on Marvin's lecture video. And I thought the trick at the time, I thought, well, this is pretty novel, but it really didn't seem to me to be that much of a fooler, as much as it was just a fun trick that had a funny surprise ending. In Steps Tommy Wonder, and he changed some of the elements. For example, many performers use a devil's hank when they go to make some of the objects disappear.

Tommy used a very small pay envelope to put his objects in, and the vanish of the ring, and the watch, and the money from the pay envelope, it's frankly pretty stunning. It's far more magical than the standard routine, but more than anything, it's a wonderful way to establish yourself as a magician at the start of the show. So I'm sorry I didn't include that in the Tommy Wonder episode, but I encourage you to look that up on YouTube. It's available there. 

So let's get into today's podcast.

This man was born Bernard Schwartz on June 3, 1925, and you may know him as a Hollywood actor who


starred in such movies as Some Like It Hot, The Defiant Ones, Operation Petticoat, The Boston Strangler, and Spartacus. But most of you listening will remember him for his unique and defining role as Harry Houdini in the 1953 George Pal-produced Paramount movie, Houdini. The magic consultant on that movie was a magician by the name of George Boston, and in June of 1953, an article appeared in Genii magazine titled "Harry and Bess, a la Tony Curtis and Janet Leigh."

And one of the things that George points out was that Tony insisted in doing all the magic himself. No stuntmen, no body doubles were used. He points out that Tony Curtis spent 12 hours a day practicing and learning the various tricks for the movie. This went on for several months. Now, it never occurred to me before, but I honestly think that this one thing, this one strategy on Tony's part, is what sets that movie ahead of all the other Houdini movies. When Tony does the tricks in this movie, he's actually performing them.

And early on in the movie, we see Tony taking a milk pitcher, pouring some milk into a paper cone, and having it vanish into thin air. And if you watch, the entire trick is shot with one camera angle. The first camera edit isn't until after the milk has vanished and changed to confetti. Then the camera moves to an audience shot. Also interesting, the next lines are the sideshow couple who say, "That magic act has to go. It slows up the turnover," to which her husband replies, "Yeah, but he won't play the wild man unless I let him do those tired tricks."

Interesting dialogue, and somewhat true to the Houdini story of being a wild man in a sideshow, as well as doing magic in a sideshow, but what's more interesting is something I found out recently. Often in a sideshow, the magic act, which was one of the first acts you'd see, was in that early position to make sure that the tent was filled before they were moving down through the rest of the attractions. So the magic act actually had a part to play beyond just doing tricks. As I researched this episode, I came across numerous articles, but in the magic press and in the Hollywood media, that pointed out that no tricks were exposed.

This was said so many times, it's crazy. And compare that to every other Houdini movie, which seems like it's their duty to expose some sort of Houdini trick. Here they stuck to a strict code of not exposing and being sure that Tony could do everything. Now back to Tony Curtis. So he's actually performing this effect, this vanishing milk to confetti. It's not a camera trick. It's not special editing. It's Curtis doing a magic routine for the camera. And I think this is part of the charm of the movie, and why it has such a strong grasp on so many of us, and why it's still popular today.

We're doing a magic show inside of a movie, or within a movie, and it works wonderfully because, well, the stars of the movie, Tony and Janet, have done their due diligence and can actually present these effects and present them well. I told this story before, but the scene with the vanishing milk, it holds special significance for me and my interest in magic. Because after watching the movie, I, as a kid, went and found a newspaper and formed it into a cone, got a pitcher of milk from the refrigerator, and attempted to duplicate what I had seen in the movie.


And come on, how hard could it be? Needless to say, the milk poured out rather quickly out of the bottom of the cone onto the kitchen floor, and that's when I learned my first lesson of magic. There's more to this magic stuff than I realize. A true story. That really happened. The next thing, and there are two of these. There's a feather flower production that Tony does right after the milk pitcher thing, which he gifts to a girl in the audience who turns out to be his future wife, Bess.

There is an effect where she writes her name on a piece of paper, and he burns it, and then the ashes are rubbed onto his arm, and the name appears on his arm. The name Bess appears on his arm. This one is sort of, it's a real life effect. You can really do this thing. Obviously for the movie, he knew it was Bess. It's part of the script, but having the ashes and the word appear on the arm, now that's the magic trick. It's an old classic, and Tony does it really well.

A quick view of the stage setting, and we see a number of things here. We see a card star in the background, a really close examination. You'll see a set of linking rings hanging from a side table. And in the back, there appears to be a bottle and a cube with a flower in it, which is possibly the old passe-passe bottle trick. And I guarantee you that Tony Curtis learned every one of these. So here are the publicity photos for the movie. Tony is seen in various shots.

One, he's holding onto billiard balls, with Bess holding a billiard ball stand. And another, Tony's doing a jumbo rising card effect. There's another photo still of Houdini and Bess doing the jumbo rising cards. Another photo of Tony in a tuxedo with a rabbit in one hand and a top hat in the other. There's also a curious photo of Tony recreating one of the early Houdini promo photos. In this image, he's holding a silk tube with scarves coming out of either side. There's a few side tables surrounding him with many props on both tables.

In the background, there's even an authentic Houdini poster. And it's quite a sight to see Tony Curtis in this particular image. Further research led me to articles that stated that Curtis would often do magic for the press, who were covering the movie. In particular, his billiard ball routine, numerous card tricks, among them pointed out the classic Paul Curry effect, Out of This World. And here's an excerpt from The Linking Ring, Volume 32, Number 8. Magic. Brother, what a shot in the arm magic will get from the movie Houdini.

You should see Tony do billiard balls, cards, and numerous other sleights. And he's hot on the trail of cigarette manipulations, thimbles, coins, and everything else. The fellow is a real magic bug if I've ever seen one and plenty good already. In the George Boston article he points out that both Houdini and Tony Curtis share a Hungarian and Jewish background. He also makes the claim that the real Houdini and Tony Curtis look eerily similar. That one, that one I'm not so sure about. Then he points out the illusions.

And again, he says Curtis, and this time also his wife Janet, rehearsed countless hours to learn the various illusions which appear in the movie. Now for historical purposes, some of the illusions in the movie were not in the real Houdini's show, but some were. Chief among them that were the metamorphosis, which again is actually performed by Tony and Janet. One has one long continuous shot, no edits until the end. There is a slight difference between the real Houdini's metamorphosis and the Tony Curtis one. In the movie version, a line of chorus girls with feathered fans block the trunk from view.

In the real Houdini version, it's a cloth cabinet. But it's essentially the same mystery and done very well. Magician Ray Muse writes in M-U-M before the movie was finished the following. According to our information, the picture deals with Houdini's early life, his speedy success, his love for his mother, and his rise to the SAM presidency. Tentatively, penciled in are scenes in a West Virginia mining town, his success before the Russian court in Moscow, his headlining the Winter Garden and annual SAM banquet in New York City.

And well, and not all of that could make it to the screen. Some was altered, like the Russian court turned


out to be the Kaiser's court in Berlin. If there was any SAM stuff, though, there is an early magicians banquet that says Society of Magicians annual dinner. It's only missing the Society of American Magicians, which historically didn't exist at that moment in the history of Houdini. And I'm not going to give you a trick by trick list here, but I do want to share something about the controversial ending of the movie.

Now, as you know, and if you don't know, the movie came out in 1953, so you've had plenty of time to watch it. It's a true spoiler. Just pause and go watch the movie and then come back. But for everyone else, Houdini dies doing the water torture, or what they call in the movie the pagoda torture chamber. And there are some odd things here. It's called Other Magic. This one is highly edited and quite frankly, for good reason. It truly is Tony Curtis being lowered into the tank.

And there are several establishing shots of this, some close up shots, some far away shots, and even some that appear to be taken inside the tank from Tony's perspective. Bubbles coming up from the bottom of the tank add a great element to this effect. Houdini apparently passes out due to an injury he sustained in his dressing room only moments before. And keep a note of that. Now, what's really going on here is they replace Tony with a dummy and they put in, this is the scene where they're going to break the glass with an axe.

And according to an October 1996 article in Magic Magazine, quote, "The force of the escaping water flushed the dummy onto the edge of the cut glass and sliced it in half." And then you watch the scene where they break the glass in the movie. You can tell it's a dummy very clearly. Now, in December 1976, we find a rather strange note and it comes from the New Tops magazine, the column Magic Around. It says, "George Boston, technical advisor on the movie, once explained to this columnist that the Weiss family agreed to never blame Harry's death on the Canadian student who had hit him in the stomach in order to collect an insurance policy, hence the false and contrived ending."

And this is why Houdini bumps into a sword from a sword cabinet in his dressing room rather than have Whitehead, the college student, punch him in the stomach. The movie premieres. The film premiered in New York City on July 3, 1953. Now, I never gave a whole lot of thought to what the magic world thought about this movie, but given the fact that I'm in the magic world, I assume that many people felt like me, that the story was mostly fictional, but it was very entertaining.

But as I researched this episode, I started reading reviews in the magic periodicals and most said, "You're going to enjoy this movie. It does more for magic than anything has done in years, which I believe to be true. It really put magic in a positive light and exposed it to millions." Most reviewers point out that there are a few historical mistakes, but again, push the fact that it's an entertaining movie. There are showings at magic conventions, special showings for groups of magicians, and one instance, 250 magicians and their wives attended a performance.

Magician Will Rock came out of retirement to do a straitjacket escape to promote the movie. Magician Will Desmond did a hanging straitjacket escape near the Oregon Paramount Theatre to promote the movie. Time Magazine covered the movie with the spread of photos, many of which are not even seen in the movie. Then along came Milbourne Christopher. He also says, "You will likely enjoy the movie," but put down pretty severely the fictionalized aspect of the story. And it's possible he was also upset for losing out the technical advisor role to Dunninger.

Milbourne had gone to Hollywood and met with the producers as a possible tech advisor. Just imagine how different this movie might have been with Milbourne Christopher as the tech advisor. But for whatever reason, they went with Joe Dunninger. One thing that bothers me, though, is all the work that George Boston did to make Tony Curtis into a competent magician and he gets no screen credit. In the book 100 Houdini Tricks, it is said that it was Dunninger who supplied all the tricks and illusions, all of which previously belonged to Houdini.

Okay, the book 100 Tricks is by Joseph Dunninger. And here's another quote. Here's an exact quote. "Recently, Dunninger acted as technical advisor on the Paramount motion picture Houdini. Aside from directing all of the sensational effects, Dunninger trained Tony Curtis to perform many of the escapes and mystifying illusions which Houdini made famous throughout the world. All of the apparatus and tricks used in the picture were the original props which were actually used by Houdini and were loaned to Paramount by their present owner, Dunninger." That is a load of malarkey.

But only a few pages later, in the same book it says, "Much of the paraphernalia used in the movie was at one time the actual property of Houdini." And that statement is slightly more accurate. According to an interview that Tony Curtis did at the Magic Castle in 2009, Dunninger was a blowhard. George Boston was the real tech advisor. And this information came from Wild About Houdini December 18, 2010. Also, many of the illusions used in the movie didn't exist in Houdini's time or were certainly not used by Houdini.

The sawing in half, the ribbon through girl, the broom suspension, the levitation to name a few, and I'm not even clear on the origins of the steel straight jacket to be honest. Here, according to George Boston, adds more to the truth of the props. "The illusions in the picture were either rented from Leo Irby, Renee Monteverde, Aubrey, Jim Connelly, the Hollywood branch of Abbott's Magic, or built by the Paramount Studios under my supervision. And the sub trunk was on loan from Jack Gwynne. And I've seen it with my own two eyes, by the way."

Another review from the Magic Press came from Bob Lund. Bob was a famous collector and would be known for the American Museum of Magic. Here's what he had to say about the movie from the pages of Abracadabra, Volume 22. "An atrocious claptrap of inaccuracy and hokum. It had one of the most lubberly casts of mummers ever assembled." Then he goes on to point out some of the ridiculous pieces of promotion from the studio. And by the way, I'm going to include one of those ridiculous pieces of promotion because honestly, I found it kind of cool.

And here it is. "A set of amazing parallels surrounds the picture. Both Houdini and Tony Curtis were born in New York. Their physical resemblance is staggering. Curtis' real name is Bernard Schwartz. While the man who owned the motion picture rights to Houdini, his name is Berman Schwartz. George Boston, Tony's magic teacher, is married to Janet Boston. Tony's wife is Janet Leigh. Houdini died 26 years ago at the age of 52. 26 is half the count of a deck of cards. 52, the entire deck. Tony Curtis is 26 years old.

Again, half of a deck of cards. And the movie went before the cameras on August 26th. There are three Georges connected with the production. George Pal, the producer, George Marshall, the director, and George Boston, Tony's magic trainer. Finally, Tony's middle name in Hebrew is Harry. That sounds like a Hollywood promotion, and they did get a couple things wrong, but frankly, I thought it was kind of interesting. Now, not surprisingly, Bill Larsen Jr. was a big fan of the movie, and he should be because he's in the movie.

He does the Lester Lake head chopper routine during the magician's banquet, which is strangely, it strangely has a fake ending. When you watch it straight through, he performs the effect right up until putting the blade through the girl's neck. But for whatever reason, they cut to Tony and Janet as a reaction shot. But then when they come back to Bill Larsen, there's a fake head that falls into the basket. I'm not sure what the reasoning behind this was, except maybe to accentuate that Houdini is the only one that does real magic in the movie, and everybody else does fake magic.

I don't know. That might be the reason. I have no idea. But I can't help but wonder if there was a huge run on the Lester Lake head chopper after this movie appeared. I kind of wonder about that. Another alternative reason going through the process of getting the girl out of the headstocks takes a lot of time. This way made it much faster. Probably that's the reason. Larry Weeks took advantage of the movie to sell Hamburg 8 handcuffs, the same type that Tony used in the movie.

In the ads for these, he mentions that Tony uses these cuffs in the 1953 Houdini movie. In August of 1953, Russell Holman, Houdini's press agent, this is Houdini's press agent, wrote a piece for the MUM magazine. In it, he mentions the Houdini movie and he says, "One thing about Harry Houdini, however, is certain. If the guy were alive today, he sure as hell would be riding herd on the boys in the 1953 Paramount Publicity Department to use him for exploiting the new Houdini film." I think he might give a special hand to your very handsome Tony Curtis who learned Houdini's tricks so well and whose black eyes on occasion remind me of Houdini's.



I also found this review from Neil Foster in the New Tops magazine. The first time I saw the picture was with Dr. Harlan Tarbell and he wept several times during the movie. I had known the Houdini's intimately and this I thought was a great compliment to Mr. Curtis and Ms. Leigh after the movie. So an actor acts in a movie and by the time it comes out, usually they're deep into their next project. Amazingly, the magic bug stayed with Tony Curtis for a long time. He was so adept at the magic that he would often do it at parties.

And I'd like to point out that George Boston, who taught Curtis, had previously worked with Thurston and with Blackstone. He knew his stuff and he knew how to teach Tony to become a good magician. I found a clip of Tony Curtis on the Rosemary Clooney show and in the scene, he removes a cigarette from his pocket and then he does just like a master manipulator causes the cigarette to disappear and later brings it back from his bare hands. It's very well done. It's a little hard to see though because it's a black and white format, but if you're a Chavez student, you're like, "Hey, that's right out of our course."

I'll try and post it over on the blog if I can get a good enough video of it. But after this sequence, he does sort of a dancing hank, which is not very good. But the sleight of hand sequence with the cigarette, trust me, is done perfectly. Some interesting things happened long after the movie. George Boston gave the straitjacket that Tony Curtis used in the movie to George Davenport in England so George could present it as a gift to the Magic Circle Museum where it still resides today.

In the March 1966 issue of Genii magazine, it states, "Paramount, a few months ago, began preparations with Leslie Stevens on a Houdini  series for CBS based upon the 1953 Tony Curtis feature of the same title." I can't seem to find if that ever happened, so I'm going to guess it maybe it didn't. In the May 1967 issue of Genii, there is an obituary for Earl Lockman, an escape artist. In his bio, it stated he provided the props for the Paramount Houdini movie starring Tony Curtis.

So perhaps he, Earl, along with Leo Irby and others, contributed pieces to the movie rather than it being all Joe Dunninger. Incidentally, the milk can used in this movie was provided by Leo Irby, another escape artist. Irby presented it on the show You Asked For It, in which George Boston was the man who lined up all the acts. In 1968, on the Dick Cavett show, Tony Curtis levitated Dick Cavett with the help and consultation of Walter and Litzka Gibson and props borrowed from Clayton Rawson. In a later appearance on the Dick Cavett show, by Tony, Cavett said, "Of their previous illusion, they received a whopping one fan letter."

And I can't find any footage of this, which is likely a good thing as apparently there was a miscue which exposed the method. October 1968, Tony Curtis becomes a member of the Magic Castle in 1969. Curtis gives the Masters Fellowship Award by the Academy of Magical Arts to Richard Cardini. According to the April 1969 issue of Genii magazine, Tony Curtis attended two Houdini seances at the castle with guests. In fact, in May 1969, while on the Joey Bishop show, Tony mentions he needed to leave early to make it to the Magic Castle to attend one of those Houdini seances.

In 1973, Tony Curtis was again a presenter at the annual Academy of Magical Arts in Hollywood. This time, he gave Bruce Cervon the award for Best Close-Up Magician. Dai Vernon mentions in his column, The Vernon Touch, that Tony Curtis actually performed an escape act as part of the evening's entertainment. He presented Mark Wilson's frame escape that Mark had presented previously on the Magic Circus TV show. This was actually Harbin's Assistant's Revenge, which was a fairly new illusion in 1973, and by all accounts, Tony did a great job as the amazing Anthony.

Also in 1973, Curtis filled in as host for Johnny Carson. During his few nights as the host, he had three different magicians on the show. Mike Skinner and Mark Wilson were two of the three performers that appeared. August 1974, The Linking Ring states that Tony Curtis is to headline a venue in Las Vegas as a magician. I don't know exactly what became of this, however, if we backtrack to November 1967. Tony did two shows a night for a month in the Hollywood Palace at Caesars in Las Vegas.

Ralph Adams was the main magician, but Tony Curtis presented the head chopper with an audience member each performance, and often a celebrity audience member at that, so think of it kind of like the Rat Pack with magic. Strangely, both tech advisors, Joe Dunninger and George Boston, both died in March of 1975. Also in 1976, Tony Curtis gave Johnny Thompson the Academy of Magical Arts Award for stage magician of the year. Now sometime in the 1970s, and I'm not sure when, Tony Curtis appeared on the Mike Douglas show.

Now he appeared on the Mike Douglas show a lot. He was often the host or co-host of the show. But I remember this vividly, just as if it just happened. He was on the show with another guest who had written a book about stunts that parents could do to share with their kids, and one of the stunts they did was slicing a banana before he peeled it. It was a cool thing, and they demonstrated it and showing how it worked. And then the topic of magic came up and Houdini came up, and Tony mentioned that he did all the magic in the Houdini movie, and he could still do quite a bit of it.

And then he took a playing card and he held it at his fingertips and caused it to vanish. And a moment later he reached out and that same playing card was reproduced. Now, we're all familiar with what this is. It's out of the world of manipulation magic. But on the show, Tony then exposed it and taught it. And normally, I have to say, I would be against such things, but as a young boy, I watched this diligently. I watched every move he made, and I learned it.

So basically, Tony Curtis taught me how to do that move. And years later, a family friend came by for a visit and noticed I had a deck of cards on the table, and he took a card and he goes, "Hey, let me show you this thing." And he went to do that very trick. His technique was pretty poor, but he was not a professional magician by any stretch. You know, it was okay. And then I took the card and I said, "Oh, you mean this?" And I could make it vanish almost instantly and show both sides and even spread my fingers to show it was gone and then reach up and reproduce it.

My friend was duly impressed. But I've always looked upon that particular move as one taught to me by Tony Curtis. In 1977, Tony appears on the Dinah Shore show and along with Doug Henning. And apparently, the theme of that show was Houdini, but I can't find a video of it. I found the opening where Doug performs, but the second half with the interview seems to, whoever had the video, removed it. So that's a shame. January of 1978, Tony Curtis was on Merv Griffin and again did Magic.

March 11, 1978, and another Academy of Magical Arts Banquet, Tony gave the Visiting Magicians Award to Jer Cooper. In 1980, Tony, Julie Andrews, and Walter Matthau filmed a movie called Little Miss Marker on location at the Magic Castle in Hollywood. And yet another Academy of Magical Arts Banquet, Tony Curtis gives Johnny Thompson the Stage Magician of the Year Award again. Then in 1980, working with HBO, Tony hosts a new special called The World's Greatest Escapes. Tony, with his white hat and white coat, hosts the show, and I don't think that Tony was really on the top of his game here.

Maybe it was the way the special was shot, I don't know. My friend Steve Baker was featured in the opening escape, and he's also featured in two other escapes in the show as well. He's also on the show where Dorothy Dietrich with a hanging straitjacket escape. A fellow by the name of Loyal James does an escape. And Carrie Ross does a very comedic straitjacket routine. In 1982, Tony would appear on the Magic with the Stars TV show for NBC. Hosted by Orson Welles, it featured many professional magicians like David Copperfield, Richiardi Jr.

and Norm Nielsen. But celebrities also did magic, including Tony, who did a costume-trunk illusion with Morgan Fairchild. Nicely done. In 1983, Tony did an escape on the Circus of the Stars TV show for CBS. And according to Magic Magazine, May 15, 1991, Tony was set to host a two-hour-long magic special from Japan, tentatively titled The Magic Star. Performers who would appear on the show would also receive a Houdini Award, designed by Tony Curtis. Now, I kept digging. That's all I found on this initially, and then I found a little bit more.

I found out that it was taped on May 21st before a live audience in Japan. And originally, they wanted to present Doug Henning with a Lifetime Achievement Award. Doug was retired, and he wasn't partaking in the show, so instead they gave the award to Siegfried and Roy. Magic included appearances by Juan Tamariz, Rudy Coby, Galina, Dean Gunnarson, the Pendragons and more. And the name of the special was changed from the Magic Star to the Houdini Awards. Apparently, all the acts were good, but the timing was really off on this thing.

And Tony Curtis even had to leave before the whole thing was over to catch a plane, so someone did not coordinate this very well. It was presented mostly in English before a non-English-speaking audience, which just makes it sound like a total mess. Yeah, so let's go to November 2001. The Houdini stamp is revealed by the Postmaster General, and on hand for the ceremony, Tony Curtis and Lance Burton. Lance does a hanging straitjacket escape, and he mentions that he was inspired when he saw Tony Curtis as a kid watching that Houdini movie.

Tony Curtis died September 29, 2010. He died of cardiac arrest in his Las Vegas home. And I know, my friends, I did not get every instance of Tony doing magic on TV. There were other talk shows he was on that maybe only lasted one or two seasons that I don't even have a record of. I know he was on Merv Griffin many times, and I don't have all those instances. I wish I had video of all of it. It would be so cool. The only other thing I have, though, is kind of a personal story, and that is, I went to what we call our last family vacation.

My folks and my brother and I, we flew to Hawaii to have our last family vacation as a family before, you know, I moved away and my brother moved away and so forth. Anyway, I remember walking down the street in Hawaii. I think it was on Oahu and Waikiki, and there was an art gallery there. And as I was walking by, I was like, "Hey, I'm going to step in here for a second." And not knowing, I walked into this art gallery, and I saw this unusual painting, and it was really pretty cool.

And then I noticed it says there was a plaque, and it said, "Paintings by Tony Curtis." And I thought, "That can't be the Houdini Tony Curtis, no." And then I turned, and on the other side there were these sculptures done by Anthony Quinn. And as I looked around, I noticed that all the artwork in this place was all done by celebrities. Those were Tony Curtis' paintings, and I just got absorbed in this whole thing. And it was at that moment when I was there that I thought, you know, when I retire, because I always planned on doing magic full-time, so I thought, "When I retire, I'm going to paint."

Because I was inspired just by this, and if you know anything about me, about 20 years ago, I decided, "You know what? I don't think I can just retire and paint. I don't think it works that way. I think you've got to develop your skill." So I started painting about 20-some years ago. I had already knew how to paint from school, but I had a great ability with art. I won tons of awards and those kind of things. But I began to paint, and everything I painted was magic-related, and some of my paintings have appeared on Magic magazine, and I think there was one inside Genii magazine, a couple other mag-some non-magic magazines as well.

And I know that one of my-I did a commission for a friend who's a screenwriter, so he's got a big Cardini painting in his home, and I've done quite a few others. That whole painting thing came from Tony Curtis, from seeing his work, and then not only being inspired to do magic because of his movie, Houdini, later to being inspired because of his artwork. Finally, I do want to point out one thing very quickly. I made a sort of an analogy when I was talking about the Houdini movie and the fact that it had magic in it, and I said it was a magic show within a movie or a movie within a magic show or something like that, and I thought that was a very clever way of putting that.

And then I was over on wildabouthoudini.com looking at some of the stuff that John had written over there about the Tony Curtis movie, and he actually had those exact same words that this was a magic show within a movie, and he had written it years before that I wrote that, so I don't know if that was stuck in my subconscious or not, but I do want to point out that John wrote it over there first. And by the way, if you want to find out more about the kind of in-depth things with the Tony Curtis Houdini movie, he does a great job on wildabouthoudini, covering some of the things that, you know, the creation of the movie, some of the early versions of Houdini movies that never came about, some of the people that were up for the movies.

I mean, he does just an incredible deep dive into that, and I encourage you to go over there. But I also want to say a big congratulations to John Cox, because he was just announced that he's going to be getting the Ambassador of Magic Award, which is a Milbourne Christopher Award, and he's going to be receiving that in September of this year. Congratulations, my friend. You certainly deserve it, and I'm very proud of you for getting that being nominated, and getting it in the whole nine yards, and congratulations.

My friends, that's going to do it for this episode of the Magic Detective podcast. I'm sorry if this sounds off a little bit. If you know any of the background here, I'm actually recording this on my phone and then transferring it over a computer, because I'm on the road, and I don't have all my equipment with me. So I'll be home in a couple of weeks and be able to get back to normal. But until then, thank you for listening, and please take care, stay safe, and we'll have another episode here for you very soon.

Take care, my friends. [music fades out]

Listen to the full episode on the Magic Detective Podcast

Houdini's Library with Dr. Eric Colleary: Podcast Transcript


This is the transcript of episode 118 of the Magic Detective Podcast, Dr. Eric Colleary & Houdini's Library. Listen to the full episode here. The transcript was generated automatically, so expect a few spelling slips.

This is episode 118 of The Magic Detective Podcast. On this episode you'll hear about the new book and exhibit called Houdini's Library. That and more on this episode of The Magic Detective Podcast. Hello and welcome to The Magic Detective Podcast, your podcast home for magic history. I'm your host Dean Carnegie. I am The Magic Detective and this is episode 118. Thank you to everyone who has reached out in regards to the format change. Please keep in mind this is only temporary, at least I think it's only temporary.

I don't want The Magic Detective Podcast to become an interview show like every other podcast out there, but I don't mind doing an occasional interview. In fact that was always the plan from day one to do a combination of interviews and my long form episodes. I just never really implemented that. The response from episode 117, the Charles Green interview, was absolutely overwhelming and if you have not heard it yet please go back and listen and check it out. Very, very informative. Also a little off-topic someone DM'd me recently and asked about my paintings, my artwork and yes they're gonna be coming back.

Back a couple months ago I was having some troubles with my Spotify account trying to get it all synced up and everything and I just decided at one point it was gonna be easier for me just to pull it, you know, rather than kind of put band-aids on it all the time. So it will be coming back here hopefully soon and I will be offering prints of my artwork once again. There's a new Houdini painting I'm working on right now and I may have another one before we get into October.

So anyway you'll see them all in good time. If you thought episode 117 was good wait until you hear what's in store today. I have Dr. Eric Colleary from the Harry Ransom Center here to talk about his new book and exhibit. This interview was very eye-opening and I must say I myself I learned a lot and you will too and with that let's not waste any time let's get into today's feature.

Interview with Dr. Eric Colleary, Harry Ransom Center

Dean Carnegie: Today on the Magic Detective podcast we have the Klein Curator of the Performing Arts at the Harry Ransom Center, part of the University of Texas at Austin, Dr. Eric Colleary. He's here today to tell us about a new exhibit at the college called Houdini's Library and also about his book of the same name. Eric welcome to the Magic Detective podcast.

Eric Colleary: Thank you so much for having me.

Dean Carnegie: Alright so we're gonna get we're gonna jump right into this. So during his lifetime Houdini was a massive collector. He was kind of bordering on being a hoarder quite frankly. He collected books of various subjects, he collected signatures of famous people. It was said that he even owned a desk that belonged to Edgar Allan Poe. Now I know many of his scrapbooks ended up in the Smithsonian in Washington but not all of them. There are books and letters and ephemera that ended up in lots of collections because when Houdini died all the magicians jumped on Bess Houdini and said what can I have?

So can you clarify for my listeners exactly what is in your collection?

Eric Colleary: Yeah it's a great question and it's it's really one of the the reasons that I did this book in this exhibit because there have been so many questions over time. Really I mean Houdini you mentioned it was sort of borderline hoarding and you're absolutely right it was a huge collection and it's something that he talked about in almost and every interview that he ever gave he worked it into almost all of his letters even when it had nothing to do with his collecting. He was deeply proud of it but when he died you know interestingly the story about his death those obituaries and the stories about his death lasted about two weeks but the stories about his library lasted the next two years but then the mythology sort of around Houdini came up and the focus shifted away from the collecting and the story of Houdini as a collector back on to the man and

the escape artist and a lot of those stories around his library really fell away. So when he died in his will in 1926 the will left the magic library and the spiritualism library to the Library of Congress and the dramatic library which was the third big part of it was left to his wife Bess to deal with and so that's that's sort of in a nutshell and then of course the act and then a lot of family material all of that was left to Hardeen with the understanding that his act would be destroyed or Hardeen's death.

So that's how it played out in the will and there was some complications with that and it went through probate and what's really exciting was that this is this was brand new research and I really want to credit Amanda Zimmerman at the Library of Congress who really helped with this and helped really dig through the the collection files there to see how it all played out. This has been a big question for former curators here at the Center, former curators at the Library of Congress but what happened was the Librarian of Congress himself came to the Houdini home in New York and Bess Houdini gave him a tour and said the magic books are the ones here in this big shelf along the back wall and then all the spiritualism books are piled up in the room here and that's what you're gonna get and that turned out to be over 5,000 volumes and over

120 scrapbooks and all of that went to the Library of Congress within within weeks of that visit and it was really also in the will. Bess was the one who was designated as the executor and it says very specifically that she's the one who will make the decisions about what these things mean what does it mean the magic library and that kind of thing so all of that got broken up there were a lot of people asking about the dramatic library which you know the newspapers were salivating I mean this the stories about this collection were legendary and so people had been asking about it and she had turned them down multiple times because she was hoping to sell it for a large sum of money and and also a lot of the people were asking too early and so the probate came out in March of 1927 the Library of Congress picked up their

stuff the next month in May she gets this letter from a guy named Messmore Kendall who's a real estate developer in New York is credited with being the first purpose building the first purpose-built movie theater in Manhattan the Capitol Theatre and he had gotten outbid on a bookcase that had belonged to a theater manager named Augustin Daly and Houdini was the one who won the bookcase and for many years it held Houdini's dramatic library in it and Kendall when he saw Houdini had died this was his opportunity to get that bookcase again so he he wrote to Bess asking if he could you could come and look at it and the story is that she not only sold him the bookcase but offered him the contents and said there was at least 26 crates worth of material in storage and she would sell and sell him the lot and all of that got piled up

and and into his apartment and over the Capitol Theatre which is just off of Times Square at the time the Library of Congress opened the collection they cataloged it and it opened in January of 1928 and one of the first people at the door was a guy named Henry Ridgely Evans Evans was the was a great biographer and historian and magic and at one point Houdini had planned to do a big book project with Evans and it all sort of fell apart but Evans had always wanted really access to Houdini's collection and he was the one who had suggested that he placed the collection at the Library of Congress because Evans worked down the road at the Department of the Interior and so really was it was very selfish on his part so he was the he was there day one when the collection opened he was one of the first people through the door

in January of 1928 and he shows up wanting to really work on this big biography he'd been planning on Cagliostro and he says well where is it where's where's all these documents related to the diamond necklace affair where is where are all the prints and engravings of all the famous magicians the the photographs the the letters all of the stuff that he'd been collecting for years none of that was in the collection and he wrote to Bess and Bess wrote back that the collection all of that material had been filed in with a dramatic library by Houdini's library and Mr.

Becks Alfred Becks and so all of that had been sold to Messmore Kendall. Kendall had it in his apartment until he decided to retire to Florida in 1957 and originally offered it to the New York Public Library who didn't at the time they didn't have the space or the funds this was before the Lincoln Center Library was built and so the curator there knew that the University of Texas at Austin was starting this major research library and performing arts and that they had a donor a guy named Karl Hoblitzelle who was a vaudeville impresario that had been buying you know significant collections for the University and and convinced the donor to buy it for the University this time so the Kendall collection arrived at the University of Texas in 1958.

You're right though that there was absolutely you know there was a huge amount of material that went to the Library of Congress an enormous amount of material that also came to the to the Ransom Center including a lot of his personal papers that sort of got swept up in the dramatic library and then there was a lot of stuff that was just abandoned at the house that Bess was so eager to get out of that house that things were left there. Also what I've been finding in the research was that Bernard Ernst the Houdini's longtime lawyer had had collected a lot of things from the house and from Bess and had been giving things away to other people as well so a lot of the material that would end up in the John Mulholland collection that's now with David Copperfield a lot of that had actually come through to Mulholland through Ernst.

And so it was complicated so actually some of them some of the interesting Houdini items that are more personal very little of what the Library of Congress got was actually about Houdini himself it was it was his collection so the things that the Library of Congress now has that are extraordinary pieces about Houdini's life a lot of that came through the McManus Young Library which was partially bought from Hardeen's family after Hardeen died in the 1940s. So it's all of this is a very complicated story but it's all to say that I think a lot of people who especially who listen to your podcasts are collectors themselves historians themselves and know how these collections sometimes get broken up and really it's extraordinary that any of it survives at all not just after Houdini's death but the fact that Houdini was able to lay hands on any of these things some of it dating back hundreds

of years it's it's every little item in these collections is something of a miracle.

Dean Carnegie: Wow well you just answered half the questions I have for you okay so that I mean the the the history of the collection and where it went and I didn't expect you to know the the Smithsonian information

Eric Colleary: That's all the Library of Congress

Dean Carnegie: Yeah yeah that is oh yeah the Library of Congress that is that is incredible so you mentioned the Houdini bookcase and I just want to mention to to the listeners this is not the famous bookcase that Houdini stood in front of and had a photo and now that particular bookcase is in the David Copperfield collection this is a completely different bookcase you mentioned where where it originated now do you have that today?

Eric Colleary: We do have that today it's an extraordinary piece of furniture like I said that belonged to the actor manager Augustin Daly who owned several theaters back before Broadway the theater district used to be in Herald Square and he had a big big theater collection these were custom built bookcases so Houdini acquired the bookcase because it had this lineage in theater history that was really quite extraordinary there's a lot of interviews with Houdini where reporters go in into his home and they talk about the different collections and this bookcase is specifically singled out on more than one occasion Houdini describes it as the Augustin Daly bookcase he describes it as belonging you know holding his theater library there's one reporter who says you know there's it's such a big bookcase it's nine feet square he says you know there's there's really interesting items on the top shelves and Houdini climbs up on boxes in front of

the bookcase to get there if you've seen the pictures of Houdini and his home with this is the library you know it's it is it is borderline hoarding but I think you know one of the questions I had always wondered was whether or not you know you use you meet collectors occasionally who you know they they get material and they open you know they never open the packages it's just sort of sitting there Houdini was very much he knew what he had so even though it's like piled up on the floor you know floor-to-ceiling he stayed up he told people he stayed up and I believe him to like four in the morning most nights reading reading the material he often told reporters that he looked forward to retiring from the stage and spending his remaining days with his wife and his library it was really really important to him an incredible story at one

point where he's filming Terror Island and he's in a plane going to Catalina Island and they they had turbulence and he writes to his library and I could think of nothing else but my wife and my collection it's it's a it was it was really central to him and I I guess one of the things that I find so important about it is that if you if you're at all a Houdini fan or even a magic history fan broadly I think what a person collects and how they collected speaks volumes about who they are as a person what their interests are what their ethics are what their values are what their resources are and their networks and friends and you know how they were able to make it all happen and you can read that and see a different side of Houdini than certainly the one that he presented to the public

Dean Carnegie: Oh most certainly well the fact that he was collecting this stuff in that time period is rather unique I mean magicians weren't collecting or well as a whole magicians weren't collecting things back then so I think he picked up a collection from a from a gentleman over in Europe and whose name escapes me at the moment but that that gentleman had a collection of stuff Houdini acquired I think all of it eventually but you know I don't think Howard Thurston and Harry Keller and these guys I don't think they were building libraries full of stuff Houdini was the exception and thankfully so because it preserved at least in the in the magic part of it you know volumes that would have been clearly lost now the dramatic side that that has to be I don't you know you would know better than me whether the there are collectors in the in that the dramatic world

that you know that go back that far or was it similar to the magic world I mean it

Eric Colleary: There were definitely collectors I mean I what's extraordinary to me about the magic community is that often the history is baked into the magic itself so when you're learning a trick you're also you're learning it from someone else who learned it from someone else who learned someone else and they're they're sort of sharing that history but they're also aware oftentimes of like okay well this person did this trick this way and then this person took it and did something different so you're learning the different variations with it and that was certainly the case and that's how Houdini really got started collecting was he was interested in that history and those tricks so that he could understand like even you know when when he died there's a famous interview famous to me now it was a magic when I found this but he they they caught Malini and in his hotel lobby and this reporter and

they said you know Mr. Malini now that Houdini has died has his have his secrets died with him and Malini laughed as he's you know smoking his cigar and he says no you know Houdini was great at what he did but he wasn't an originator if you want to know his secrets look to his library which was like obviously like well that's that's the introduction for my my book I couldn't have asked for a better one than that but yeah it's he meant he meets this guy Evanion when he's on tour yeah Henry Evans Evanion who Jim Hagee has written an incredible book about him Evanion had collected this inherited this amazing collection from another magician James Savran and this is like you know over 200 years worth of incredible magic history that was sitting in his basement in London and Houdini ends up acquiring the bulk of it and some of this ends up

also getting left to the British Museum and is now at the British Library but it was truly an incredible collection what you find also in Houdini's letters with other magicians is like is that there are other magicians who are interested in collecting but nobody who's really able to get at the scale that Houdini is working on so there's a letter for example in the collections from from Thurston to Ellison the very the very famous magic collection that's now at the New York Public Library where he offers over a thousand dollars to Ellison for his collection which ends up not working out but Thurston's trying to build up a library but it's hard to compete with Houdini who's built these relationships with dealers all over the world and they're keeping an eye out for things and will sell it sent him things on account in terms of the Dramatic Library Houdini doesn't really start collecting intentionally

theater history until around 1915 when he realizes he's been collecting playbills for years you know in bulk he goes to Leeds at one point on his tour and there's this guy who salvaged hundreds of thousands of playbills from the local library who had thrown them out because they decided not to collect you know collect them anymore and Houdini buys the entire lot and they they're tied up in bundles that he sends them back to New York and they sit in his basement for six years before he starts having this conversation with a guy named Quincy Kilby who's a manager the former treasurer of the Boston Theatre and Kilby is also a collector of theater history and he's convinced trying to convince Houdini like don't go into theater history there's too many people who have amazing collections out there you can't possibly build a big theater collection but you could really focus in on something specific

like Edwin Booth or the Booth family there's still really good material out there but Houdini's like great I'll think about that but also you know come to think of it I've got all these playbills in my basement and it turns out you know there's New York playbills in that collection that date back to the 1770s and you know early London playbills dating back to the 1740s they don't exist many of these don't exist in any other library or any other collection in the world and it's only because Houdini had the foresight to collect it the New York Public Library's collection largely doesn't even start their playbill holdings until the 1860s after the Civil War there's a century's worth of playbills that Houdini has been collecting before that it's truly an extraordinary collection

Dean Carnegie: Fascinating you had mentioned Henry Ridgely Evans a few years back I had a had a show in in DC and when it was over I turned to my assistant and I said she said well what are we gonna do now I'm like oh oh well you're not gonna believe it but we're going we're going to a cemetery and she said what and I'm like oh yeah yeah so cuz we've done this before we do this all the time so I went to a cemetery in Washington where Henry Ridgely Evans is buried yeah almost killed myself because the cemetery so old that the the the paths and everything were super slick it was raining but sure enough we found it we found his grave I took some pictures and then as we were leaving the cemeteries right next to this mansion that sits gated mansion and I look at it and I'm like wait a minute

there's something about this softly familiar we'll come to find out in his book new the new and old magic he mentions when he's younger and he wants to perform for the first time and he gets a gig at a particular place in Washington DC where he performs and it the whole thing's a disaster and this turned out to be the place where he performed this this

Eric Colleary: Oh wow oh man

Dean Carnegie: Right next to the cemetery where he was buried so that was a fascinating thing yeah to stumble upon by accident

Eric Colleary: He was a character he he ended up writing that Cagliostro biography and writing to Messmore Kendall to actually have access he did finally get access to that Cagliostro material that Houdini kept from him he originally Houdini had he'd gotten a copy around 1902 of Thomas Frost's Lives of the Conjurers and there were so many factual errors in that book that it really pissed him off to the point that that's actually fueled so much of his early collecting was to to really build the collection that would allow him to write a better version of Lives of the Conjurers and Evans was gonna ghost write that at one point for him and there's incredible letters between the two of them over a period of time where Evans is sending him drafts of the manuscript and Houdini is just getting so angry and he says you know you're falling into the same traps that Frost did and all

these other people that's not true this is not right this is not factually correct and Evans says and responds he says I know it's not correct but you're sitting on the material I need to make it correct either either you do this yourself or you let me have access to it but this is the best I could do with what I've got so it's it was a complicated relationship between the two of them but but thankfully well documented in the archives

Dean Carnegie: Wow fascinating fascinating okay so before before we started recording I asked you a question and I'll just further my listeners I'll just tell you what it was Houdini had a lot of posters during his career but we know that there are some posters that he had that that did not survive there are no existing copies and the reason we know this is there are photos of the front of theaters and you see the the posters on the wall but those posters they're you know none exist anymore I've always been of the belief that Houdini is gonna have a poster for anything that's really big in his show and there's nothing bigger in his show than the vanishing elephant and there is no vanishing elephant poster that we know of but I've always believed that sure enough there has to be a vanishing elephant poster now a couple years ago you and John Cox over at

Wild About Harry had a had had a revelation and and I think you said it's in the exhibit so could you tell us about that

Eric Colleary: Yeah so this has been part of the collection and a well-known part of the collection really since the 1950s when it arrived here but there are two what look like two prototype designs for a vanishing elephant poster that are in watercolor slightly different styles certainly a different color scheme one of them that has a sort of like a vaguely Egyptian border around it but certainly advertising the vanishing elephant at the Hippodrome and it's not entirely clear if either of these were ever made but certainly there were clearly designs for them the Ransom Center also holds in the Houdini papers a newspaper grant banner advertising the the vanishing elephant but it doesn't have any images on it and unfortunately because it's newsprint it's it's brittle and a little chunk of it it seems to be missing but the that's also in the collection John and I when John came to visit and did some research here

he found an incredible letter from Houdini to a guy named Kit Clark who was a good friend of his an elderly theater agent and and Kit Clark was too sick to come see Houdini perform the vanishing elephant act and as a as a gesture sent promises to send him a poster of the vanishing elephant act and that was for John clear evidence that one had been made but it's wild that they don't seem to survive he would think that would be one that people would would absolutely want to preserve so we don't have any of the actual prints but we do have the two prototype designs

Dean Carnegie: That's fascinating well the vanishing elephant and the other one I'm convinced there was a poster was walking through a brick wall those two I mean they're just iconic Houdini effects and he had posters for everything of that nature so I'm sure there were you know a vanishing elephant poster and walking through a brick wall poster unfortunately they don't survive so we all I guess we'll never know unless unless you know one wild ways

Eric Colleary: Yeah so we just we did a big restoration recently on a Hardeen poster that's in the collection that seems to be the only surviving copy but it's it's the exact same poster of a Houdini but the but the face has been replaced by Hardeen but it's the St. Paul printing company and so we've just done a treatment for that that's also in the exhibition right now

Dean Carnegie: Is that a is that a the milk can poster or is that

Eric Colleary: No it's a it's a handcuff poster so Hardeen with some police officers and his hands crossed in front of him with a hand handcuffs on yeah it's a it's a wonderful poster and a few others like that in the collection that Houdini had collected himself that seemed to be the only surviving posters of their kind certainly a very well-known now poster of Vermont of Herman an evening in spirit land that seems to be the only surviving one of its kind beautiful full-color lithograph

Dean Carnegie: Amazing now I went on your website I was looking you know at the various pictures and there's there's actually a photo on there of a poster I was not familiar with that is it's a Houdini poster from one of his movies looks like a very long three sheet where he's hanging off a cliff can you tell us about that one

Eric Colleary: Yeah that was from Man from Beyond so this was this is extraordinary too because it's it seems surprising that there don't seem to be full-color lithographs of the Man from Beyond posters but we you know the press kit that went out to theaters has all of the different variations of the Man from Beyond posters that they were the the company was offering for advertising but these are Houdini's own set of the actual posters themselves so there's a three sheet there's a one sheet and then there's a couple others that are all from from that film it's really really great to have those in the collection and yes the three sheet Man from Beyond is currently part of the exhibition now here at the Ransom Center and that runs through the end of January of 2027

Dean Carnegie: Wow Wow okay so I know just from looking at the website I have not been to the exhibit yet but I will make a trip before before it closes you have posters on display books photos are there any like artifacts like I think I saw a ball and chain or something but and there and there's a strange thing hanging on the wall it looks like it could be jewelry or a costume part can you tell us about any of the artifacts that you have

Eric Colleary: Yeah it's it is a paper-heavy exhibition that's that's sort of really what was mostly in Houdini's library so there's letters there's there's photos you know interestingly there's a letter from Georges Méliès where Méliès is offering Houdini several of the original Robert Houdin automaton several of which are now in the Copperfield Library and Houdini clearly doesn't take him up on this he's not really he collects some magic tricks from other magicians mainly to perform them but he doesn't he's not really a collector of historic magic tricks himself so or the apparatuses or illusions or anything like that there's a whole case on historical historic locks and lock picking that includes a ball and chain from the collection that that case has you know books dating back to the 1700s about lock mechanisms that Houdini had in his library so that he could understand how the mechanisms worked there's also yeah this incredible replica of the diamond

necklace that sort of figured prominently in the affair the diamond necklace in France in the late 1700s this is part of a sort of a collection of material related to the diamond necklace affair that Houdini was able to acquire from an English book dealer this this is always sort of pointed out in the interviews about Houdini's library as an example of like the breadth the historical breadth of Houdini's collection and he was really proud of it it was an incident that helped lead to the French Revolution what it turns out was really that he was interested in Cagliostro who was a major sort of central figure in this scandal and there's original letters and manuscripts related to Cagliostro and the four trials which related to Marie Antoinette and Louis XVI so yeah so there's that replica of the necklace that was sort of at the center of that case and of course the bookcase itself

which which stands right in the center of the exhibition so not a whole lot of objects but a lot of books and a lot of the photographs including Houdini's own personal photos he he had a camera with him whenever he went on tour he was taking photos his assistants were taking photos many of those glass plate negatives in prints are part of the Ransom Center's collection including over 130 of the glass plate negative some of which are only just being published now for the first time in the companion book

Dean Carnegie: Okay oh that's that's good I was gonna ask you what is different between the exhibit and the book that's that's so so the in the book we're actually going to see some photos that have not been seen

Eric Colleary: Absolutely yeah some extraordinary photos for example there's photographs of Houdini with a prototype of the Water Torture Cell where he it's it's made out of wood at that point where it seems like these photos are being taken by an assistant so that Houdini gets a sense of what it looks like from the outside but he's sort of hanging suspended under upside down from it extraordinary photographs of his tours where you know they're sitting on top of a cart with all these boxes going to the next theater and you know they're just taking a photograph of like the Royal Exchange in London as they're passing it on the cart so they're they're really an incredible documentation of life on the road so there's things like that in it the book really tells the story in detail about Houdini as a collector from his father Rabbi Weiss all the way through Houdini's death and the afterlife of

the collection there's over 700 images in the book there's only about only 260 to 300 items in the exhibition depending on how you count and so there's a lot more in the book than what we were able to fit in the exhibition the exhibit really tells the story in a very concentrated and narrative way and the book is really including a lot more stories than we were able to do in the physical space deeply grateful to a number of different collectors to who not only provided images but you know people like David Copperfield who has an incredible site inventory of the magic collection that Houdini clearly typed himself and includes a number of comments on specific titles things that you know the publisher should be dragged out and shot for putting this out on the market this is an exact ripoff of somebody else's book and they don't even give them credit or this is

a really good book about swindling that you know I learned a few things from so there's excerpts of that for example that are in the book that are really a lot of fun anybody who's interested in collecting I think will really find that the book and the exhibit both are it's a love letter really to the idea of collecting

Dean Carnegie: Hmm I love that so I do have one question it may not pertain to the exhibit but you have and you can tell me how many you have a lot of Houdini scrapbooks in your collection and one of the ones in particular and I don't remember how I stumbled upon it but I had remembered reading something about Samri Baldwin had had a some stuff he I think he was gonna give it to Thurston or whatever never got to him and it ended up with Houdini Kitty Baldwin ended up giving it to Houdini and that scrapbook ended up in in the Harry Ransom collection that you have yes so what else you're how many just how many scrapbooks are there

Eric Colleary: Yeah so most of the scrapbooks really did go to the Library of Congress and that was sort of just again geographically where they were in the house at the time which is really sort of extraordinary we ended up with the Baldwin scrapbook because it wasn't kept with the others at that moment at the moment that Houdini died have been moved somewhere else same thing you know we have Houdini's copy his first edition copy of the the discovery of witchcraft is actually here at the Ransom Center instead of with the Magic Library at the Library of Congress only because at that moment that book was somewhere else in the house so you know the Baldwin scrapbook was it's it's a truly beautiful it's Baldwin's own personal touring scrapbook and it's got extraordinary images from his childhood all the way through his career and there's a wonderful letter in there from Sam from Shadow Baldwin to Houdini

after Samri Baldwin died offering it to him for the collection a couple years ago actually really quite extraordinary at the Potter and Potter auctions I was able to get a letter the actual letter from Houdini to Shadow Baldwin thanking her for giving him this scrapbook and saying when I die I'm leaving my he calls it his mystery books in that letter his mystery books to to the Congressional Library which yeah and when I when I decide to shuffle off this mortal life he says so it's a it's an extraordinary thing to have it was clearly his intention that that scrapbook would go to the Library of Congress but again where it was in the house and ultimately Bess was named executor and it specifically says in the will she would be able to she would be the one to determine what would go where so so there it is but it's what's extraordinary to me

too is that these two large parts of the collection have landed both at the Library of Congress and at the Ransom Center both institutions have really done a lot over the years to care for it to make it accessible in both instances anybody with the photo ID can set up a research account you don't need to be a credentialed academic you don't need to be working on a project you can come in and use this material for whatever you want even if you're just curious and want to browse that's really important to us so and that's really the bread and butter of what with these institutions do it's there as a research library that occasionally gets to put things out on exhibit

Dean Carnegie: Fascinating fascinating all right I have one more question for you I was not familiar with this person but I had to look him up and then I went oh how ironic so among the items that Houdini had in his collection was the travel diary of a man named David Garrick can you tell us a little bit about him and then the conduction to Houdini which I'm assuming you know what I'm talking

Eric Colleary: Yeah David Garrick it was one of the most famous actors on the English stage after Shakespeare he lived in the 18th century moved up the ranks and became the actor manager the sort of owner of the theater royal Drury Lane one of the sort of three major theaters in London at the time David Garrick really did so much to make English theater a thing and certainly make Shakespeare Shakespeare the fact that we remember Shakespeare today for example was really owed in many ways to David Garrick and his memorializations so a lot of a lot of in there's a lot of interest in theater historians on Garrick he is able to get a copy of David Garrick's travel diary the actual original handwritten diary through Maggs Bros.

the same booksellers in London who get him not only the Cagliostro letters but also the the discovery of witchcraft volumes we know exactly how much he paid for Maggs Bros. incidentally is still very much active and a family business in London today Wow but this travel diary is it's from 1751 Garrick is going from England to France for the first time is descended from French Huguenots so it's a really meaningful trip to him and it's it's hilarious you can sort of see that he goes to the Comédie-Française and attends the theater and it sort of validates in his mind the superiority of the English stage and it goes missing for years biographers know that it is a thing because Garrick in the 1780s it goes back to the France and says I'm not gonna write much about it now because I did so much my last diary but it goes missing it turns out it's

in private hands and who when Houdini acquires it he's the first one who makes it accessible for research there's a graduate student who ends up writing her dissertation about it and then Houdini dies and she gets permission from Messmore Kendall to do to publish a transcription of a full full transcription so a really important piece and just one of many extraordinary examples of priceless unique items that relate to the broader theater history really part of Houdini's larger mission to professionalize magic and just have it have it seen as the art that it is on the stature of the legitimate theater

Dean Carnegie: Amazing now the the other the connection that I was referring to Houdini dies in Detroit the last place he performs the Garrick theater after David Garrick absolutely totally ironic that that would be the name of the last place he ever performs and he has this travel diary in there as well and I'm glad you shared more history of David Garrick because I was not familiar with the magnitude of how important he was so that's that is that is great I appreciate that so the Houdini library exhibit it runs it's currently running now it runs till January 24th 2027 on September 17th you will be doing a special reading and discussion of your book at the Harry Ransom Center and the most important thing is how do we get a copy of your book

Eric Colleary: Oh you can it's a great question thank you for asking it you can get a copy anywhere you can get fine books so I have a wonderful publisher Abbeville Press who's put together really beautiful volume you can get it directly through their website abbeville.com or you can get it through amazon.com or anywhere you get your books from it's a it's a hefty 25-pound book I believe so it's it's gonna sit very nicely on your coffee table and there's not just about Houdini but so much about magic history and theater history and performance more broadly in that something in it for everybody I think

Dean Carnegie: Wow well Eric thank you so much for being on the Magic Detective podcast and sharing this has been incredible I've learned so much and it's been fascinating so thank you so much for being here today

Eric Colleary: I'm honored thank you very much for having me here

Dean Carnegie: My pleasure and we will we will talk soon in person when I come visit the exhibit

Eric Colleary: I can't wait

Dean Carnegie: You take care

Eric Colleary: You too

And that my friends was Dr. Eric Colleary the curator of performing arts at the Harry Ransom Center in Austin Texas talking about his new book and exhibit on Houdini's library by the way before I go very far yes I know the difference between the Smithsonian and the Library of Congress I for some reason I've got the Smithsonian on my brain every time I meant to say Library of Congress I said Smithsonian so forgive me for that that was just a little hiccup in my my head - spending too much time doing research this week anyway if you like this episode please be sure to like it in any way that your podcasting provider allows also if you happen to be on Apple podcasts I've got a bunch of five-star reviews over there and if you'd like to add another one that would be awesome if you don't like the podcast hey send me an email

and tell me why but so far I think the listeners are pretty happy until next time keep your feet on the ground and keep reaching that's sorry that's the wrong one here it is until next time be well and stay safe

Listen to the full episode on the Magic Detective Podcast

Charles Greene, Author of Exposing Houdini: Podcast Transcript


This is the transcript of episode 117 of the Magic Detective Podcast, Charles Greene Author of Exposing Houdini. Listen to the full episode here. The transcript was generated automatically, so expect a few spelling slips.

This is episode 117 of The Magic Detective Podcast. On this episode, we talk with author Charles Greene about his new book, "Exposing Houdini". That and more on this episode of The Magic Detective Podcast. Well, I have just now officially gotten out two podcast episodes back to back within a week of each other. Amazing! I'm going to continue, or at least try to continue in the same fashion for the next several weeks, giving you new episodes fairly often. And going forward for a while, they're all going to be Houdini related.

Which brings me to today's episode. I have a wonderful guest with me today, Mr. Charles Greene. Now, Charles is a full-time professional magician. He's a corporate magician, a trade show magician. He's worked with many major corporations over the years, and that's how he's earned his living. He was a restaurant magician at one time. He even worked at Six Flags at one time, but he made his career as a trade show magician. But interestingly enough, Charles is also a magic historian. And not just a magic historian, he's a magic collector and a magic author.

He wrote the great book on Ionia that came out recently, and he has one of the largest private collections of magic posters in the world. And he is, on top of all of that, a super nice guy, and I'm proud to have him here today on the Magic Detective podcast. So, without further ado, let's bring in Charles Greene.

Interview with Charles Greene, author of Exposing Houdini

Dean Carnegie: And now we have our guest, Charles Greene. He is the author of the book Exposing Houdini. And this is a very interesting book, a very different kind of book when it comes to Houdini stuff. And Charles has a whole adventure that goes with it, a whole story. But before we get into things, I have to ask a question. Now, when I think of, and by the way, welcome to the podcast, I should say.

Charles Greene: Thanks very much, Dean. Good morning.

Dean Carnegie: Good morning. So when I think of Houdini people, names that come to mind, Milbourne Christopher, Amazing Randi, Pat Culliton, John Cox, myself, I don't always think of, well, I don't think of Charles Greene in that list. But just to be fair, our mutual friend, Wayne Allen, is a Houdini guy. He's been writing a book on Houdini for 30 years, and he doesn't come to the top of the mind to most people either. So my question for you is, were you like a Houdini guy? We just didn't know about it?

Or how does that go?

Charles Greene: I am not a Houdini guy, honestly, and to be included on that list with you, Pat Culliton, John Cox, Milbourne Christopher. I mean, that's really a dream come true, or it's really like amazing, because all of this started when I was a kid. So as a kid, I was introduced to Houdini almost immediately. I grew up in Hackensack, New Jersey, and downtown there was a bookstore called Warm Raphs on Main Street, and two of the books I picked up when I first started Magic were Expert Card Technique by Braue, which is not really a beginner's book.

And I also picked up The Illustrated History of Magic by Milbourne Christopher. So kind of like from day one, Houdini has always been there. And I think for most magicians, no matter what you pick up, what you read about in Magic, he's gonna be there on day one, day two, day three. He's coming in pretty soon, and he just stays with you forever. So I'm not a Houdini guy. I'm not a Houdini collector. This collection literally fell into my lap because of serendipity.

Dean Carnegie: Amazing, amazing. Okay, well, go ahead and give us how this happened. Tell us what transpired to make this whole thing take place.

Charles Greene: Well, it simply was pure luck and just the notion of doing something and going the extra mile. As a solo performer, I've been a professional magician all my life, and I know that if I don't do it, no one's going to do it for me. It's just a thing of my life. So I was told about this auction in Ohio that had a few Houdini pieces in them. And I went to the website, I saw the listing. The listing was very, very vague. It basically said Houdini images, glass plates, and that was about it.

I mean, there's only like four lines of text or so. There were some pictures, but because they were glass plate negatives, they were mostly dark images. So in my mind, I thought, I don't know what this is, so I'm going to call them. So I called them. I didn't get much information, but I did ask them two questions. The first one was, well, can I see them in advance? And they said, yes, you may. It's open to everyone. There's a preview. And it was actually these plates were part of a two week sale of abandoned safe deposit box materials.

So just like today, someone goes out and buys storage containers in groups and they sell all the stuff that's in them. That's what this was. So this had been abandoned property. And with abandoned property of this nature, there's a five year waiting period before the items can be sold. So this person passed away at least five years. So I went there. And oh, the second question I asked them was, when I'm there, can I take photographs of them? They said, yes. So I went to Ohio, flew into Cleveland, flew into Columbus, Ohio, grabbed a car, drove an hour to a place called Newark.

And there I was introduced to the room and there's a big room because most of the items there of the two week sale were shiny objects such as coins, stamps, jewelry watches. And I asked for the two lots and there were two separate lots. So you get one lot at a time. The first lot was brought out to me in a cardboard tray. There were approximately seven or eight boxes, old, scuffed up. I opened the first box. I pulled out a slide and I realized, looking at it to the light, I had never seen that image before of Houdini.

Well, I went through all the boxes and realized that they were all mostly Houdini or centered on Houdini. So I just gave that lot away, returned it, and I was always supervised during this process. The other lot was brought to me. I opened up that set of boxes. Same thing. I was in amazement as I saw images I had never seen before. Or if they were images I had seen, they were iconic, such as with the milk can, him in the airplane, him with best things of that nature.

I took photographs of all of them and I spent two hours taking photographs in the room and other people at the same time were in there and also taking photographs of those plates and other things in the room. Before I left the room, before I left the auction house, I backed up all of my materials onto a hard drive and flew back to Washington, D.C. Now, I did have special equipment. I had talked to someone at the Library of Congress and I said, "I don't know what I'm going to see there.

It could be just pictures from a book or it could be something really special. I have no idea. But what do I need if it's a glass negative?" They said, "Well, you need to bring a few things. You need to bring a light source," which I did. "You can buy them on Amazon." One day I got them the next day. "You should have a tripod." And then they said, "You're going to need a dust bulb because you don't want to touch them because they're extremely fragile.

They really even shouldn't be out in the light. And then you're going to need a camera." I said, "Well, I don't have a fancy camera." And I said, "All I have is really an iPhone." I was told that would be fine. As long as it's on a tripod, that'll be fine for taking these images. And that was it.

Dean Carnegie: Wow. Wow. Okay. Well, I've seen the book. I've seen the images. Here's a question. Now, you and I have talked about this before, where they came from.

Charles Greene: Yes.

Dean Carnegie: Origin. I'm wondering, because we had a conversation once. You asked me if I had this. Do you have this?

Charles Greene: I have that. Yes.

Dean Carnegie: You do have it. Okay.

Charles Greene: Not only do I have that, I have spoken to the person who created that.

Dean Carnegie: Okay. And then for our listeners...

Charles Greene: Joe Tanner is alive.

Dean Carnegie: Oh, okay. Okay. Great. Great. Okay. So he is alive. So you have talked to him.

Charles Greene: He is alive. I have talked to him. You know, so much of this stuff in history is like, you know, you go to reach out to someone and it's like, "Oh, they died last year. Oh, they died last week."

Dean Carnegie: Yeah.

Charles Greene: But Joe Tanner is very much alive. We've had a conversation about the catalog, the slides, the negatives, the pictures that came from the negatives. So I've gotten a much clearer picture as to where these things came from.

Dean Carnegie: Interesting. Now, did he... I was looking through the catalog this morning, and of course it says in there, and I think you mentioned it in your book as well, that they likely came from the Dunninger Collection via a gentleman named Rick Sizmer. And there's even a letter in the catalog from Rick, a letter from Mrs. Dunninger, but I noticed this morning that the letter from Rick only talks about locks and restraints. It has nothing to do with the other stuff. So very curious your thoughts on that.

Charles Greene: Well, you know, I have a lot of time, and I do a lot of... I make a lot of phone calls, and so I kind of find these threads, you go down these rabbit holes. So I have talked to someone who knew Richard Sizmer. There's always a thing about how to pronounce his name. So I knew someone who was his best friend outside of magic, but knew him for years in Canada. I talked to another friend who was a good friend of his who worked with him in Canada and knew him very well.

So here's the story as I've pieced it together. And this is really the first time I've got this in one place, and I'm sharing it with everyone.

Dean Carnegie: Love it. Yeah.

Charles Greene: So, Joe Tanner and the catalog, there are pictures in that catalog which dovetail with pictures and images from the negatives that I saw in Ohio. They're not exactly the same. Then there are pictures... Oh, there are negatives that were available from Joe Tanner. Together, it lets us know that most likely these pictures in the catalog and the negatives that he saw all came from the same set of negatives at one point. So that's where it breaks. And Joe Tanner never met Richard Sizmer, which I found interesting.

I didn't know. So he never met Richard. This was at a time when Joe was in Montana, and Richard at the time was in Canada, in Ontario. Okay, so that's one side. We go to the other side of this puzzle. The slides came from Houdini. They were definitely Houdini's property. There are things written by Houdini, by Kugel, by the assistants that are on the labels. They then go to Joseph Dunninger. Dunninger passes away. Richard Sizmer hears about the passing of Dunninger and Mrs. Dunninger living in the house, and he sends her a letter saying, "Hey, I'd like to come down and visit."

Mrs. Dunninger says, "Sure, come on down," and invites him to the house in Cliffside Park, New Jersey. Richard is there for a period of months, over a period of maybe a year or so. He has access to the house. He's painting. And he's been involved with magic. He knows about magic. He had a show. He was an escape artist. He knew about magic items. So he had total access to the house. At some point, the daughter of Joseph Dunninger comes to the house with her husband and says, "You know, some things seem to be missing from the house.

Things are not here that were here." And so they instituted or began to say, "I think he needs to leave. I think Richard needs to leave and not come back." At some point, she created a suit, actually sued Richard for certain items. But as the case went on, he came to trial. She did not. And so the case was dismissed.

Dean Carnegie: Interesting.

Charles Greene: So that's where we are with knowing that items have been taken from the Dunninger house and then wind up with Richard Sizmer somehow. Now, we know that items wind up with Richard Sizmer because the two people that I mentioned earlier who actually knew him have told me that they had glass negatives in a box that came from Richard Sizmer. Richard Sizmer gave it to one, gave a box of negatives to one person, told that person to hold on to them. That person thought that they were a gift and then was surprised that when Richard took them back later.

But that's what took place. The other person told me that Richard Sizmer would go down to New Jersey, spend some time, come back and have gifts that he said, Richard, were gifts from Mrs. Dunninger. So that's what we have. The other thing is that if you start looking into this, Richard Sizmer created a paper trail. If you go on Magic Cafe, the old meeting group for people before I think before Facebook, Richard Sizmer is on there and he talks about being with Mrs. Dunninger, the slides, the items.

And he says, I'm giving items away. I'm letting them go. I really don't care. And then he says specifically, I've given items to someone that no one knows and I'm not telling and no one will ever know where they are. Now, it's my belief. This is what he put in print. It's on the web. You can go look at this now. It's my belief that these negatives may have been in the safe deposit box of that person. We'll just call them person X.

Dean Carnegie: Yeah.

Charles Greene: Only other thing is that these negatives may have been with Richard Sizmer because at some point he lived in Arizona, went back to Ontario, but Richard Sizmer died young. He died of a heart attack unexpectedly in his living room in a chair while watching TV. So Richard may have had them and then they were in a safety deposit box or person X may have had them in a safety deposit box and they passed away. But we definitely know that Richard Sizmer had access to Dunninger items, brought back gifts to Canada.

And we know that Richard Sizmer intentionally gave things to someone else with the idea that they would not be found and would not be known for a very, very long time.

Dean Carnegie: Wow. Wow. Okay. Well, I know it's a lot to unpack. Yeah. I knew Richard, but very towards the end of his life. Okay. And I didn't know him well. I'm trying to think about, I mean, I met him through Steve Baker, the escape artist. Okay, sure. He and Steve would talk every now and then on the phone. And Steve and I talked every day on the phone. Wow. So that's how I got introduced to Rick, but I didn't. I remember at some point the Dunninger name coming up.

I honestly never made the connection of Dunninger Houdini and all this other stuff. So when it came about that his name came up, I was like, oh, oh, what's this? And then all of it kind of as it came out, I'm like, oh man, I didn't know anything about this. And I did know, I remember when he passed away because it was like you said, it was, I think Steve had talked to him one day and the next day we got a phone call from his fiance or an email from his fiance saying he died.

And we're like, what? So that is, it's amazing that you were able to get all of that, but also it helps to kind of fill in the story of the plates as well. That's amazing.

Charles Greene: It is an amazing story. And obviously there's a little bit of a gap, but I feel we're close enough to know where these slides came from. These slides, as it seems to be written by Houdini, these are a part of his collection that he was going to use for his autobiography. And so, you know, the Milbourne Christopher talks about an autobiography that Houdini was writing the draft for. At some point Houdini lost the draft and then gave up the project. And because of the nature of these slides, going from 1903, there are personal slides, there are studio slides, there are just casual slides.

From 1903 to 1911, they kind of fit the genre of what would be used for an autobiographical book.

Dean Carnegie: Okay. Okay. Interesting. Interesting. So you're checking out these slides. You're flying back and forth, you see them, you have copies of them now. At what point did you decide this could be a book?

Charles Greene: So the first point that I got when I went, what really pushed me was when I saw the ad, it's like, I have no idea what's in Ohio, but they've been gone for 100 years because they've been, you know, no one's seen them. If I don't see them or someone doesn't see them, they could be bought by someone, return to another safety deposit box, and no one will see them for another 100 years, no one will know about them. You know, as I always go back to that scene in Raiders of the Lost Ark, the very last scene is of like, we have the Ark.

Yeah, because it's safe. Don't worry, we have the Ark and you see it just in a warehouse of warehouses with insight. Oh yeah, we've got it, but it's kind of useless at this point because no one knows where it is and no one knows what it is. Yeah, I didn't want that to happen to this. So I just go not knowing what's there. And then I know that these are important. And so my first thing was I want to go and share them with everyone, no matter what I see.

Sure. So here's the chronology of that. I saw them one day on the day of the auction, which was a week later. So I saw them a week before the auction or a few days before the auction. The day of the auction, after the auction was over, because I was bidding on these as well, I sent John Cox images of these negatives. I said, here's the auction that took place today. Here are some slides and images that were in the auction. And so the day of, or maybe the day after the auction, he put them up on his site.

OK. Then a week later, I think he put some more pictures on his Patreon. So they were available for other collectors to see. Then I printed out the negatives as positives and I took them to NEMCA, where you, Bruce Averbook, Ken Trombly, Johnny Gahn, Mike Kaveny, Ben Wynn, a bunch of collectors looked at them. My question was, have you seen anything? Did you know about them? And I heard from people that they knew about the sale. So Ray, Ray Ricard knew about the sale. Bruce Averbook knew about the sale.

Other people knew about the sale. But no one decided to go for whatever reason. And if they had gone, well, things would have been very different.

Dean Carnegie: Oh, for sure. For sure. So, well, OK, here's the next question. You said you were bidding on the plates. Did you, was it sold as just a lot or did they sell them individually and did you get any?

Charles Greene: So there were two lots. I think number 9315 and 9316. So two batches.

Dean Carnegie: Oh, OK. You said that in the beginning. OK.

Charles Greene: All right. So there are two batches and I was able to win the first batch. Nice. I bid on the second batch. I did not win that batch. Someone else won. Interesting. I don't know. How do I just how do I say this? To be correct, I have heard of the person who won the second bid. I have called them repeatedly over the last six months because I only learned who that was in May and I've not heard back from them. So I know I have one batch of negatives.

I'm the only person, it seems, who has the complete set of photographs because I'm the only one who saw them, took photographs of them all and then made positives of them all. And they're all in the book. There is a little problem with glass negatives. This is one of the great things about being the collector. There are always two sides. Glass negatives are extremely fragile. They should be put in archival folders. They need to be climate controlled or they will just disintegrate. Because they are negatives, you cannot just pick them up and hold them.

Not because they're negatives, but you just can't pick them up and you shouldn't put your fingerprints on them. You can't you shouldn't transfer oil onto them. That comes from your body. You should handle them with gloves. They should be kept in low light so that you just can't pull these out and show them to everyone. So as negatives, they're they're wonderful, but yet at the same time, they're also extremely fragile.

Dean Carnegie: Well, that makes sense. I did see a picture when I was researching a little bit of this of I guess it came from the auction house of someone holding one of the glass plates up with their bare fingers and the comments on that particular page was, what is happening here?

Charles Greene: So yes, very true. I mean, you know, I don't want I don't want to like disparage the auction house because this is a this is a high. This is an item that really has historic value and it's extremely fragile and it's not what they do. I mean, they they do picnic baskets. They do farm equipment. They do jewelry. They do a ton of stuff. This is out of their wheelhouse. It's not a specialty. So yes, there are pictures of them holding them up with just their bare hands and holding them at the edges and not the proper way to deal with them.

I do want to say one thing because there's a lot of controversy about my having these negatives and the process of what happened. I do want to say that I have an understanding of why someone else might be a little upset. There were two batches. If you go on to the website for this auction house, which is still up at this moment. And I only notice this the other day when someone asked me for some information. Batch number one, I'll call it 9315. There's only a few pictures of what might be in that batch.

Only a few. If you go to the other one, 9316, there are many more pictures of what might be in that batch. Now, here's what's happened is that both of the descriptions for 9316 and 9315 are the same. What the auction house did, because again, they're going through hundreds of items, is they just took pictures and they just put them together and just put them with those two listings. They didn't separate which picture went with each lot because it's extremely difficult. They only have darkened negatives to work with and they're in boxes and they're fragile and they didn't want to perhaps deal with that.

They said, hey, we know that there are these pictures. We know these are pictures. We'll use the same description. We'll just put these slides up. We'll just put these pictures up and we're done. Let's move on to the other stuff. Someone has made the statement that somehow slides were switched or negatives were switched or that the person who won the second lot did not get what they were expecting to get because they were looking at all the pictures that were under the listing. Now, I understand how they come to that conclusion.

However, that conclusion is false because the pictures did not accurately reflect what was in each batch. I'm the only person who has seen all the batches and have a timeline of when the pictures were taken from each batch.

Dean Carnegie: Interesting. In your own defense, the auction house gave you permission to take the pictures. They stood there with you the entire time. There's nothing that could have happened. I kind of get the controversy, but at the same time, nobody took the wherewithal. Nobody jumped up and said, let's go do this. You were the only one. Kudos to you for having the wherewithal to do that. I wouldn't have thought of it myself. I vaguely remember hearing about the auction, and I say vaguely. I could be wrong.

Houdini stuff is coming up all the time. It may have been something else, but you went out there, you did the research. I think that's fantastic. I'm sorry for the other person, but we've all won things in auctions that weren't exactly what we thought they were going to be. I'm glad you were able to get the first lot. Once you had them, at what point did you go book?

Charles Greene: That was your initial question. It was not until about a year and a half. When I first got them, I had one rule, and someone told me to initiate this rule. The rule was, do not tell anyone you actually have them until you find out who has the other batch, because there could be issues or things could come up. I follow that rule to the T. I would always say, if someone said, "Hey, do you have the slides?" I would always say, "I don't know who has all the negatives."

That doesn't really answer their question, but it does evade the direct thing of, "I have one batch," because I didn't want to go down that line. When I finally learned who had them, I called them repeatedly and never heard anything back from them. Your question was about the negatives and the book. At what point did you decide to make a book out of it? The real thing came about in January of 2016, January of this year. I was at Fred Pittella's during Christmas week. I didn't spend a week.

I was in New York. During that time, I went to see Fred Pittella, who has always invited me out to his house. As you know, he has an amazing collection of Houdini stuff. I was amazed by what he has and how much he has in that size of a space. He said, "Take a look at anything. Allow me to take photographs." I'm very visual, so there's definitely some things I keyed into, which were illustrations. As I'm flipping through things, there are pictures and sketches from a Houdini that we don't see because they're not popular, because they're in smaller manuscripts or maybe programs or newspapers.

I focused on those. When I received those and looked at those later, now we're moving into January, and then I saw the negatives or the positives of the negatives, the images. I thought, "Well, those two go together." I said, "There needs to be a third element. Things go together in groups of three." "Oh, I know. What about if I put contemporaneous articles about each one of the events that's pictured in the negatives?" That's when it came together. In January of this year, 2026, I decided to do a book.

The book could be possible. Then I reached out to someone who had done the Ionia book for me, a great company that's based up in Canada. I said, "I just have some questions." The person, my sales rep, stopped me midway and said, "Hey, when do you want the book?" I thought, "Having it for Bill Smith's Magic Collector Expo would be a really good thing instead of waiting until later. That'd be a really good kickoff." He said, "Okay, great. Here is your timeline. If you want the book to be available for that date, then we need to have your slides on March 1st."

"Now, it's January, probably middle of January." I'm thinking, "Oh, great. That means I've got to get two slides in essentially a month and a half." "I've got to do a book in a month and a half." He said, "Yes." I reached out to two designers, one who had worked on the Ionia book. Her name is Steena Hensley. She's fantastic. She does all of the work for Potter & Potter for catalogs. Then I reached out to a new designer, Jessica, who does work for Jim Hagee. The criteria was, "Can you do this book?

Can you give me your time so that the files will be done by the end of February?" February 28th, the shortest month of the year. One person said, "Yes." I said, "You're my person." We just went forward. The book itself is really not historic. It's not a magic history book. I don't look at it like that. I consider it more of a chronology, more of an art book. I was definitely influenced by Christian Bedford, who had done a book. She's a photographer, and she had done a photo book, and we had talked about that.

Not of magic, just photographs. That really influenced me a lot. I thought, "Well, let's do a photo book for Houdini. Let's make it big, coffee table. Let's really do good paper, a good case for it, hardcover." Jess and I worked together. She only had to play bad cop once to really get me in line, because it's all my fault. I did a lot of archival researching of newspapers in England, France, some Russian papers, German. Richard Hatch helped me out, of course, with translation of German. I'm pretty good with French, American papers.

I put this all together, and then Jess did a marvelous job with design. There are some things in here that are more, how would I say, more art book. There's some information that's not directly tied to every single photograph, but the acknowledgments are in the book. There's one thing at the back of the book. Oh, I had an idea, because I know how the magic world can be and collectors can be. I thought, "Well, let's put a watermark on every single picture in the book, so that you can definitely tell where it came from and who it is from."

She said, "That's really not going to make a better book, and there are ways of getting around that with technology today. Don't do that." I chose not to. Some people have criticized me for that, but that was an artistic design to make a better book for everyone, as opposed to just a few people in a small group.

Dean Carnegie: Interesting. Well, she's not wrong as far as the whole watermark thing. I came across a picture from the Library of Congress of Houdini doing a straitjacket escape in DC, and there's a big chalk mark where Houdini's supposed to be, but actually the chalk mark covers over Houdini.

Charles Greene: Oh, wow.

Dean Carnegie: It's the only image I've ever seen, that particular image, because it's not the one in front of Keith's Theater, it's the other straitjacket escape he did on Pennsylvania Avenue.

Charles Greene: Oh, wow. Okay.

Dean Carnegie: So just on a lark, I was like, "Well, let me just ask AI if you can remove this chalk mark." It did. And it's the clearest image. And I'm like, "Well, that's interesting." I was pleasantly surprised, but at the same time, I thought, "Well, there goes all that watermark stuff that people do, including yourself."

Charles Greene: Right. No, no, it's very true. We, as magicians, collectors, do not realize and have not caught up with what AI is possible, because in a heartbeat, you can remove watermarks. You can change things. You can remove things. You can add things. And literally, it's in a heartbeat, and everyone has this power.

Dean Carnegie: Yeah.

Charles Greene: So we need to make the adjustment for this new technology.

Dean Carnegie: Yeah, and good luck with that.

Charles Greene: And good luck with exactly.

Dean Carnegie: So here's a question, kind of an offbeat question.

Charles Greene: Sure.

Dean Carnegie: So if you had looked at these plates, and they weren't Houdini, let's say they were Thurston, or Blackstone, or Keller, do you think you would have done a book, or what do you think?

Charles Greene: Wow, that's a great... So I think what I would have done, I would have recorded them, especially if they were images that no one had seen. I mean, you take a plane ride out to Ohio, you want to come back with more than a cup of coffee from Roosevelt Coffee in Columbus. So I probably would have taken pictures of them to document them. Being a historian, I probably would have written, you know, maybe a short article, maybe something for PM Squared, maybe something for Genii, or maybe done a talk about them, especially if they'd been images that no one had seen.

Dean Carnegie: Yeah.

Charles Greene: It would have historical value, and really that, sharing that is really the most important thing to me.

Dean Carnegie: Okay, all right. Well, that answers that question. And the book, for the magic world, the book is just a huge bonus, because, you know, normally, the route that would have gone is what you just said. It would have been an article in a magazine, or it might have been a lecture. The fact that you created a whole book out of it is a blessing to the magic community, for sure.

Charles Greene: Well, Gabe asked me, you know, I'm good friends with Gabe, and I was out in Chicago, and he asked me some things about the book. And he said, you know, "Did you have to do a book?" And I thought about it, and I love Gabe, because he asked these really great questions that are really philosophical. "Did you have to do a book?" And I thought, you know, in our world of magic, books are really the most concrete way of holding on to information. You know, we have tons of little pamphlets, you know, Tommy Windsor and Thumbtiffs and this and that, and they get lost and sold and not remembered.

And we could do a video, but those will get lost. But in our world of magic, a book is the most important and the greatest way of holding on to information, literally for decades. So the book was the way to go. And, you know, another thing that some people brought up is, you know, "Well, you must be making a lot of money." Well, you know, no one makes a lot of money from writing a book in magic, because I'm not being funded by Vanishing, Inc. or, you know, other people.

You know, I've got to cut the check. No telling if the book would sell. You know, the magic population is very small and getting smaller all the time. So my thing is, you know, if I can break even just on production, that's my goal. I just want to break even on production. If I can't, you know, that's a good thing. I've given back to the community in some way, and that's all I really want.

Dean Carnegie: Okay. It's ExposingHoudini.com for those of you listening that don't have a copy. So have you broke even?

Charles Greene: I have made my production costs back.

Dean Carnegie: Okay, good, good, good.

Charles Greene: Yes, yes. My wife always tells me, you know, "Your time." I said, "Don't worry about my time. This is just stuff I love." But the designer has been paid, you know, the production, the publication company has been paid. So it's all been good. And we've been able to do some fun things, and I turned back. And because, once again, this is not about making a profit. So I've done things like the Viewfinder. There's an ExposingHoudini poster that I will send to you, of course, because that's hot and new.

This weekend, I'm doing a book reading, which will be the first time that the poster will be in print or given to anyone. It's at the DC Festival of Magic that's run by Brian Curry and with the IBM 50. So it's just something neat to go with the book, because I like those kind of things that go with books.

Dean Carnegie: Yeah, you brought up the Viewmaster. I was just about to ask you about the Viewmaster. So what on Earth possessed you in the 21st century to create a Viewmaster, a clearly, maybe even a 19th-century prop to do that now? I think that's genius. But what made you think of that?

Charles Greene: The thing is that these negatives are, I always get my centuries wrong, are 19th-century items, right? So the last negatives are 19th-century technology. Here we are in the 21st century. I know, growing up, that I used the Viewfinder for looking at things at the World Fair. And I wanted something fun that was like another way of showing these slides, these negatives, these images. There's kind of like bridging the gap of like, you know, there was a time when you had to take these negatives and put them in a stereograph or put them in to have a print made of them, and that's the only way you could have them.

Then we moved on through time and we get the Viewfinder, and that was another way that mostly kids, you know, use these things. And now we are here in the 21st century where we've got this thing that everyone carries around, a phone, and it has more power than the computers that sent the Saturn V to the moon. And here we are just flicking through pictures and scrolling, you know? So it's kind of like a nod to technology and a remembrance of like, it's all technology and it's all going to change.

And at the time, you know, we thought Viewfinders are great. And at this time, we think, oh, these cameras are great, you know, this phone is great. Like when we had the first iPhone, we thought that was great. But we moved on. And in the next 20 years, 20 years, it's only going to get better. So it was just kind of freezing 19th century technology in the 20th century and bringing it to the 21st.

Dean Carnegie: Fascinating. I love that. Well, you mentioned something about the book a minute ago, how concrete the books save everything for time. And this is a topic that I discuss with friends quite often, which is I'm worried that we're in the generation, it's going to be the lost generation as far as magic history. And I say that because if you look back in Houdini's time, Houdini wrote letters. And we have those letters, most of them probably. Right. Right. But I mean, he thousands and thousands and thousands of I have a couple Keller letters in my collection.

So this is we have tons of this stuff that we can go back to and we can say, OK, well, here, here was his thoughts on this. And here's what he thought about that. And he didn't like this guy. And here's why. But now we do everything via email. And I don't care who says that stuff lasts forever. I don't believe it. I have I have and you were probably the same. The early emails we had were AOL.

Charles Greene: Oh, yes.

Dean Carnegie: That company, even in business, it's not the business that used to be. I mean, they were they were in Sterling, Virginia. They had, you know, six giant buildings over there at one time. I was just over there not long ago. There are no AOL buildings over there. So, I mean, that stuff vanishes. And, you know, what are we going to do in this generation when the letters between David Copperfield and somebody or, you know, or their phone calls?

Charles Greene: Right. Right. No, it is all going to match. This is the sad thing that history as we knew it with an ability to hold onto it is vanishing literally because everything's moved to something digital and no one's going to be going through these digital files and hard drives and going to the cloud to find this information. It's quite the loss. And, you know, we get on the phone, we call people and that's not recorded. You know, we send off an email, it's recorded digitally, but no one can get it.

It's not available. It's a whole different world. And, you know, we are very fortunate you and I and other people who are living at this time to have seen those things coming literally from the pen of Houdini, the pen of Heller, the pen of Robert Houdin. They're not going to be able to do that in the next hundred years. You know, it's like I heard someone say that they said this, you know, but I can't read it because it's not in a place where I can see it.

So books are really an important thing because they do seem to last, you know, you think about how many books we still have today and from antiquity, you know, books outside of magic, you know, from the Roman and the French and everyone else that are, you know, thousands of years old, hundreds of years old. They diminish over time, but there are repositories, great repositories of books, where they are stored their terrace and they can be seen. I just want to put in a plug for the Harry Ransom Center in Austin, Texas.

It's a place where I've done some research on Charles de Vere and they're an example, a wonderful example of holding onto material and making it available to people. You know, you go in there, you just ask them whatever you for whatever you're looking for and they will find it to you. They're very much online so you can look it up there. Eric Colleary is just a gem. He's an angel. Before I ever met him in person, I was working on the Ionia book, and during COVID, I said, you know, hey, just through email.

And I didn't know him. I said, I'm looking for this thing, this Charles de Vere business card that you have in your file somewhere. And I didn't know him. And then like a week later, he said, Oh, I wish I could get it for you, but it's all locked down. Two weeks later, he sends me a note saying, Oh, here's the image, use it in a book. I was in the files for a day and I grabbed it for you. You know, it's really that kind of like combination of holding things, the willingness to share that making the connection and the communication with people that you know are seriously interested in our magical history.

Dean Carnegie: So, wow. Well, you bring him up. He's got a book coming out, I guess, any day now.

Charles Greene: It is out. It came out Saturday. I mean, I've seen pictures, we've chatted a little bit about it. He I've seen him signing the books. So his exhibit down in Austin, which runs actually started last Saturday. Just a few days ago, I know this will be time and goes, I think, until January in Austin, Texas. And it's about Houdini's library. The book itself is amazing. If you can get I'm telling everyone, get down to Austin, Texas to see this exhibit like Mystery and Wonder that was at the New York Public Library.

This exhibit that Eric has put together is going to be is it's a gem. It's a gift to magicians. Once it's shut down, it may never ever be together again. So don't miss your chance to see it.

Dean Carnegie: Well, I I knew he had the exhibit. I didn't realize it just opened. I knew it was it was going to open here soon. I will probably make a trek down there because being in Nashville, I'm a little closer than you are in DC. So that's a possibility. Yeah. Back to back to your book. Do you have a favorite image from the book, a favorite glass plate that for whatever reason?

Charles Greene: Sure. Well, there are two of them. So one is I won't give you page numbers, but one is when he's doing the trip from Marseille, France down to Australia and he stops off in Port Said. And he's just there for a couple of nights and there's a picture of him best one of his assistants and they're surrounded by mostly kids in Port Said. And it's an amazing thing because you rarely see Houdini just say kind of in a natural setting like that. And so it's just really on the cuff.

It's a casual shot. He's just surrounded by kids and the kids are probably more fascinated by the camera than they are of Houdini and Bess.

Dean Carnegie: Yeah, they don't. Yeah. Yeah. Who's this guy?

Charles Greene: You know, they're in the middle of the Sinai desert. Well, not the middle, but at the edge. The other favorite thing I have from a work standpoint and a mystery standpoint is there's a picture. I saw the slide and I thought, what is this? It's it's where you just see a bank of a river and on the far side that you just see all of these people gathering at the edge of the river on the bank. And I'm looking at it. I'm working at it. I'm looking and I think, well, this must be from Australia because there are a bunch of pictures when he's in Melbourne doing a river jump at the Queen's Bridge.

It must be from that. And so I go on Facebook. Facebook is great for answers because you just put out a question and people provide you with information. It may not be right, but you'll get a lot of information. So eventually someone says, I don't think it's in Melbourne. I think it's somewhere else. OK, so then I notice in the photograph, there's a tugboat and I look at the name of the tugboat and it says the Hattie Kaleem, or Kalam, but it's on the tugboat. So then I go online and I look up Hattie Kalam and I find out that the boat was registered in Delaware and there are mentions of it in Philadelphia and other places.

And then I start looking for Houdini in Philadelphia and I found out he did a bridge jump off the Market Street Bridge. And then it's like I find articles about this and one of them states he jumped off the Market Street Bridge. There are a bunch of small boats canoes in the water and then he was pulled out by a tugboat Hattie Kalam. For me, that's what I love is when you're doing this kind of research and you find that one little nugget, that one thing that everyone else would overlook and put all the pieces together that make it all real and give it life.

So that's my second favorite one, if not my first. I know it could be a tie.

Dean Carnegie: Okay, well, that's interesting because that brings me to the next question. Oh, yes, is page 161 is the Houdini photo challenge.

Charles Greene: Oh, yes.

Dean Carnegie: Okay, yeah. So, so you've been able to identify all these locations of all these various glass plates that you have. You've got bonus pictures in the book as well that back up the story, but then you have this loan photograph on page 161 of Houdini in an unknown location. So my question is, has anybody since you published the book been able to identify where this picture was taken.

Charles Greene: No one has as of yet now there are a couple of people, there are lots of people who are working on it, and I've gotten some information and this also brings up another issue. So the first one is, there are only three sources for items in the book and they're all identified. Most of the ones that are the original negatives I saw have a black band around them. Yeah, yeah. Now the one on 161 has a black band but it does not come from Ohio. That is an image that is in the McCord Stewart Museum in Montreal, Canada.

I've known Christian Vachon for some time I've been up to the archives up there I've seen the Houdini holdings. And this site is public that this picture is public domain. It's available today on their website in a variety of formats, and you can get a large scale a large file for this photograph so it's available to everyone. So it's public domain. That's the first thing. No one has been able to figure this one out as of yet. It was an artistic decision not to put any reference information about the photograph, but that information is in the beginning of the book because we do credit the McCord Stewart with giving us some things.

What happened, why there's no credit on this is that once people thought that it came from Canada, then a lot of the responses I got to where the photo might be taken centered around Canada. So people say, Oh, it's in Toronto. Oh, it's in Montreal. Oh, it's in Quebec. Well, most likely none of those things are true. So that's why there's no identifying information related to this, this particular image. There is one person who has followed the edge on everyone else, and that is john Cox, because john Cox has just seen so many things he's working on the diaries of Houdini's life.

He think he thinks he might know where it is. And to whoever whoever finds the answer. I'm going to offer them something really really special that's something really special so I'm looking forward to finding out where it is and solving this mystery. But so far, no one has figured out this challenge yet.

Dean Carnegie: Well, I say good luck to everybody that's searching including john, you know, like you said if anybody knows, or who anybody can find it, he would be certainly top of the list for those people. Do you still have copies of exposing Houdini.

Charles Greene: Yes, copies are still available of Exposing Houdini, as my wife says books do not make good furniture. We still have a few copies left they are going quickly, and I'm about to go to the DC festival and we're gonna be selling some books there I'm going to have another book reading that's a public festival for books tonight. I'm going to the NEMCA Northeast magic collections Association in November where I'll be speaking on exposing Houdini. And there are books available and they're available online and actually available at a special price online so that's probably the best way to get them.

And of course that's at ExposingHoudini.com.

Dean Carnegie: Excellent, excellent. Well Charles, thank you for being a guest here on the magic detective podcast and for sharing your insights into these Houdini glass plates and your wonderful book, exposing Houdini and once again, anyone out there that is interesting and picking up a copy it's ExposingHoudini.com. Do you have any final thoughts my friend.

Charles Greene: I will just say that you know we always like extra stuff so if you order directly from ExposingHoudini.com, you'll get some special exposing Houdini stickers, their bookmarks and there's some other things that are only available directly from the site. That's it for fun stuff.

Dean Carnegie: Fantastic. Well once again thank you for being here today being my guest, and best of luck selling the remainder of exposing Houdini.

Charles Greene: Dean, thank you very much. It's really been a great pleasure to share the story and I look forward to seeing you in person as soon as possible.

Dean Carnegie: Sounds good. All right. Thank you so much. Take care Charles. Bye.

And that's going to do it for this episode of the magic detective podcast. If you like this episode, please be sure to like it in whatever way your podcasting provider will allow. Even if you like give me a nice review on Apple podcasts. That would be fantastic. Until next time, I'm Dean Carnegie. I am the magic detective. Please be well and stay safe.

Listen to the full episode on the Magic Detective Podcast